DRI—The Voice of the Defense Bar files amicus curiae briefs in carefully selected cases that present issues of extraordinary importance to civil litigation defense lawyers, their clients, and the civil justice system. DRI may participate as amicus curiae at either the certiorari stage or the merits stage in cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, but only rarely files in federal court of appeals cases. Requests for amicus support in state appellate courts are referred to the appropriate state and local defense organizations.
DRI usually files amicus briefs in its name only. Generally, a case is considered eligible for DRI participation if (i) DRI can make a meaningful and original contribution to an appeal by presenting arguments, perspectives, or information that supplements rather than duplicates the supported parties’ briefs, or the briefs of other amici curiae; (ii) the case or issues are of exceptional significance to civil litigation defense lawyers, their clients, and the civil justice system; and (ii) the positions to be advocated by DRI are consistent with DRI's mission statement and goals.
DRI considers requests for DRI amicus participation if submitted on the DRI Amicus Request Form at least 45 days before the requested amicus brief is due (except in extenuating circumstances). If you are interested in requesting DRI’s participation as amicus curiae, please contact DRI at email@example.com for more information. DRI prefers that requests be submitted by counsel for the party seeking amicus support.
Where DRI agrees to participate as amicus curiae, DRI requests that counsel for the party/parties seeking support timely apprise DRI or its counsel of all relevant developments, including possible settlements, that could moot or otherwise affect the value of, or need or schedule for, preparation of a DRI amicus filing.
- 2004 Henry v Dow Chemical [Recognizing cause of action resulting in damage for medical monitoring where plaintiffs have not yet suffered physical illness or injury]
- 2004 Engle v Liggett Group [Decertify Class Action Against Tobacco Company]
- 2003 in re PPA Litigation - [Authorizing Stempler Inteview Consistent with HIPAA]
- 2003 Henry v Dow Chemical Co - [Recognizing cause of action resulting in damage for medical monitoring where plaintiffs have not yet suffered physical illness or injury
- 2003 Craig v Oakwood Hospital - [Admissability of expert testimony]
- 2003 Bates v Dow Agrosciences - [FIFRA]
- 2002 Southern Company v Richard Alderson - [What continuous systematic general business contacts subject an organization to unlimited jurisdictional exposure in a particular forum]
- 2002 Dow Chemical Co v Stephenson - [Class Actions]
- 2001 State Farm v Campbell
- 2001 Boone v Vanliner Insurance
DRI - Executive Director
Phone: (312) 795-1101
DRI - Director of Publications
Phone: (312) 698-6210
Bailey & Glasser LLP
Phone: (202) 463-2101
Winston & Strawn LLP
Phone: (312) 558-8768
Phone: (202) 486-2004
Phone: (202) 346-4190
Plunkett Cooney PC
Bloomfield Hills, MI
Phone: (313) 983-4801
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Phone: (256) 517-5198